Giulia Chiarle

509 citations
11 papers · 306 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Giulia Chiarle

11 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Giulia Chiarle
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 199
  • Neurology 24
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 43
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 13
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 12
Replace Silvia Sinigaglia with:
Silvia Sinigaglia Italy
Alberto Terrin Italy
Brendan Davies United Kingdom
Maria Sam United States
Mustafa Gökçe Türkiye
Niushen Zhang United States
Yeşim Beckmann Türkiye
Marcin Straburzyński Poland
Eleonora De Matteis Italy
Giulia Chiarle relative to Silvia Sinigaglia Italy Silvia Sinigaglia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Silvia Sinigaglia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giulia Chiarle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giulia Chiarle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giulia Chiarle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giulia Chiarle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giulia Chiarle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giulia Chiarle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giulia Chiarle. The network helps show where Giulia Chiarle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Giulia Chiarle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Giulia Chiarle Line = papers co-authored together Giulia Chiarle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2020107
2 201945
3 201842
4 201734
5 201228
6 201722
7 201510
8 20157
9 20226
10 20184
11 20241

About Giulia Chiarle

Giulia Chiarle is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (7 papers), Neurological Complications and Syndromes (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (1 paper), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (1 paper), Menstrual Health and Disorders (1 paper), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (1 paper) and Pregnancy-related medical research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (199 citations), Neurology (24 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (43 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (13 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (12 citations). Giulia Chiarle has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gianni Allais, Chiara Benedetto, Silvia Sinigaglia, Paola Schiapparelli, Gisella Airola, Ornella Mana, Valentina Audrito, Fabio Malavasi, G. Faccani and Silvia Deaglio. Their work appears in journals such as Neurological Sciences, Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, Journal of Hypertension, Molecular Medicine and Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact