Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

5.3k papers and 90.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.3k papers published in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy in the last decades have received a total of 90.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy usually cover Surgery (809 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (775 papers) and Epidemiology (769 papers) specifically the topics of Diabetes Treatment and Management (271 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (179 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (167 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy are William J. Gradishar, Sheila A Doggrell, Shyam Sundar, Jaya Chakravarty, David P. Nicolau, André Scheen, Hans‐Peter Lipp, Jörg T. Hartmann, Paul J. Goodnick and Jennifer Keiser.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy.

Countries where authors publish in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025