Gin‐Den Chen

118 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Gin‐Den Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Urology 441
  • Rheumatology 616
  • Biological Psychiatry 60
  • Physiology 483
  • Health Information Management 84
Replace Laurent F. Thomas with:
Laurent F. Thomas Norway
Domenico Pirritano Italy
Maple M. Fung United States
Jin Jun Luo United States
Isabel Cristina Barbosa da Silva Portugal
Michael Godschalk United States
Atsushi Imai Japan
Andrew J. Sweatt United States
Yoshinori Hinokio Japan
Verena Zuber United Kingdom
Gin‐Den Chen relative to Laurent F. Thomas Norway Laurent F. Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×17.6×
Laurent F. Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gin‐Den Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gin‐Den Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gin‐Den Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gin‐Den Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gin‐Den Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gin‐Den Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gin‐Den Chen. The network helps show where Gin‐Den Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gin‐Den Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gin‐Den Chen Line = papers co-authored together Gin‐Den Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003152
2 2013102
3 199995
4 201893
5 201884
6 200275
7 201966
8 201759
9 200359
10 201749
11 200645
12
Risk factors for failure of transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension in the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.
200545
13 200645
14 201444
15 201643
16 200942
17 201742
18 201242
19 201542
20 201741

About Gin‐Den Chen

Gin‐Den Chen is a scholar working on Urology, Rheumatology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 121 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (35 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (29 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (20 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (6 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (5 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (441 citations), Rheumatology (616 citations), Biological Psychiatry (60 citations), Physiology (483 citations) and Health Information Management (84 citations). Gin‐Den Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Long‐Yau Lin, Hsien‐Yu Peng, Cheng‐Yuan Lai, Tzer-Bin Lin, Chi‐Chang Chang, Ming-Chun Hsieh, Soo‐Cheen Ng, Tzu‐Li Lin, Chi-Jie Lu and Suh‐Woan Hu. Their work appears in journals such as International Urogynecology Journal, American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pain and Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact