Gina Jay

27 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Gina Jay's Hit Papers

What Do Global Self-Rated Health Items Measure? 1994 · 573 citations
5730+10+21Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Gina Jay
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 161
  • Health 378
  • General Health Professions 360
  • Demography 181
  • Applied Psychology 50
Replace Joan Bennett with:
Joan Bennett United States
Graeme Ford United Kingdom
Hidehiro Sugisawa Japan
Nan Sook Park United States
Hui‐Chuan Hsu Taiwan
Frederic Malter Germany
Carin Lennartsson Sweden
Eva Kahana United States
Julie Robison United States
Lena Dahlberg Sweden
Gina Jay relative to Joan Bennett United States Joan Bennett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joan Bennett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gina Jay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gina Jay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gina Jay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gina Jay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gina Jay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gina Jay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gina Jay. The network helps show where Gina Jay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gina Jay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gina Jay Line = papers co-authored together Gina Jay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
What Do Global Self-Rated Health Items Measure?
Hit paper breakdown →
1994573
2 1992181
3 1992102
4 199183
5 199183
6 199360
7 199157
8 202149
9 198747
10 199146
11 198944
12
Patterns of nonresponse in a national survey of elderly Japanese.
199333
13 198825
14 202115
15 202311
16 202111
17 20228
18 20158
19 20224
20 20203

About Gina Jay

Gina Jay is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology, Demography, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (2 papers), Health and Well-being Studies (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (161 citations), Health (378 citations), General Health Professions (360 citations), Demography (181 citations) and Applied Psychology (50 citations). Gina Jay has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Neal Krause, Sherry L. Willis, Jersey Liang, Jersey Liang, Manfred Diehl, Michael Marsiske, Roger C. Loeb, Anthony R. D’Augelli, Sean R. Smith and Daisaku Maeda. Their work appears in journals such as Research on Aging, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Psychology and Aging, Developmental Psychology and Arthritis Care & Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact