Denise G. Tate

165 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

Denise G. Tate
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.6k
  • Rehabilitation 407
  • Occupational Therapy 191
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 564
  • Health 277
Replace Susan Charlifue with:
Susan Charlifue United States
Martin Forchheimer United States
James S. Krause United States
Luc Noreau Canada
Lawrence C. Vogel United States
Gale G. Whiteneck United States
B. Catharine Craven Canada
Vanessa K. Noonan Canada
Rita Bode United States
Fary Khan Australia
Denise G. Tate relative to Susan Charlifue United States Susan Charlifue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Susan Charlifue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denise G. Tate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise G. Tate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise G. Tate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise G. Tate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise G. Tate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise G. Tate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise G. Tate. The network helps show where Denise G. Tate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise G. Tate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denise G. Tate Line = papers co-authored together Denise G. Tate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 167 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004285
2 2004234
3 2005217
4 2011167
5 2015145
6 2002138
7 2010133
8 1998128
9 1999121
10 2011119
11 2004118
12 2004117
13 2002116
14 1994111
15 1999102
16 201296
17 201195
18 199290
19 200375
20 201175

About Denise G. Tate

Denise G. Tate is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 167 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (87 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (17 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (15 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (11 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (11 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (10 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (9 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.6k citations), Rehabilitation (407 citations), Occupational Therapy (191 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (564 citations) and Health (277 citations). Denise G. Tate has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Martin Forchheimer, Charles H. Bombardier, Claire Z. Kalpakjian, Marcel Dijkers, Michelle A. Meade, David S. Tulsky, Gale G. Whiteneck, Jesse R. Fann, Eric D. Zemper and William M. Scelza. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Psychology, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation and Spinal Cord.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact