Gilly Nash

744 citations
13 papers · 537 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Gilly Nash

13 papers receiving 521 citations

Peers

Gilly Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 354
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 193
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 76
  • Statistics and Probability 44
Replace Débora Maria Befi‐Lopes with:
Débora Maria Befi‐Lopes Brazil
Mary Claessen Australia
C. Melanie Schuele United States
Lina M. Cómbita Spain
Luke Williams United States
M.J. van der Molen Netherlands
Thomas C. Lorsbach United States
Zoë Simkin United Kingdom
Glenda Fredman United Kingdom
Helena Bolli Mota Brazil
Gilly Nash relative to Débora Maria Befi‐Lopes Brazil Débora Maria Befi‐Lopes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Débora Maria Befi‐Lopes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gilly Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gilly Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilly Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilly Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gilly Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilly Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilly Nash. The network helps show where Gilly Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Gilly Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gilly Nash Line = papers co-authored together Gilly Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2011277
2 201355
3 201543
4 200735
5 201731
6 201729
7 201621
8 201214
9 201813
10 201711
11 20184
12 20193
13 20211

About Gilly Nash

Gilly Nash is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 13 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers), Language Development and Disorders (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (354 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (193 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (76 citations) and Statistics and Probability (44 citations). Gilly Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Messer, Lucy A. Henry, Rachel Wilcock, Laura Crane, Julie A. Hadwin, Nick Donnelly, Christopher C. French, Anne Richards, Hayley C. Leonard and Nicola Botting. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Cognitive Psychology, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Research in Reading, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact