Andrew Thacker
Impact in
-
- Modernist Literature and Criticism
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
-
- Geographic Information Systems Studies
- Spatial and Cultural Studies
Papers in
- History 13
- Travel Writing and Literature 7
- Cultural History and Identity Formation 4
-
- Modernist Literature and Criticism 3
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 3
- American and British Literature Analysis 2
- Journals
- Modernism/modernity (2 papers)Women a Cultural Review (2 papers)Prose Studies (1 paper)The Sociological Review (1 paper)Textual Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Andrew Thacker
26 papers receiving 151 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Literature and Literary Theory 129
- Geography, Planning and Development 54
- History 61
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 27
- Museology 15
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Thacker
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Thacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Thacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Thacker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Thacker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Thacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Thacker. The network helps show where Andrew Thacker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Thacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moving Through Modernity: Space and Geography in Modernism | 2003 | 125 |
| 2 | The idea of a critical literary geography | 2005 | 33 |
| 3 | The Oxford critical and cultural history of modernist magazines | 2013 | 13 |
| 4 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 11 | |
| 6 | Foucault’s Aesthetics of Existence | 1993 | 10 |
| 7 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 15 | General introduction: magazines, magazines, magazines! | 2012 | 3 |
| 16 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 2 |
About Andrew Thacker
Andrew Thacker is a scholar working on History, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Museology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 43 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Travel Writing and Literature (7 papers), Cultural History and Identity Formation (4 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Decadence, Literature, and Society (3 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers) and American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (129 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (54 citations), History (61 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (27 citations) and Museology (15 citations). Andrew Thacker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter Brooker, Moya Lloyd and Paul Brooker. Their work appears in journals such as Modernism/modernity, Women a Cultural Review, Prose Studies, The Sociological Review and Textual Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.