Gill Brown
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Psychiatric care and mental health services
Papers in
-
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 2
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 3
- Co-authors
- Waquas Waheed (5 shared papers)Max Marshall (4 shared papers)Peter Bower (2 shared papers)Adrine Woodham (2 shared papers)Amy Leigh Rathbone (2 shared papers)Julie Prescott (2 shared papers)Simone Farrelly (4 shared papers)Graham Thornicroft (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Clinical Trials (1 paper)Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities (1 paper)Digital Health (1 paper)Psychiatry Research (1 paper)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Gill Brown
14 papers receiving 283 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Applied Psychology 41
- Clinical Psychology 126
- General Health Professions 122
- Psychiatry and Mental health 42
- Health 22
Countries citing papers authored by Gill Brown
This map shows the geographic impact of Gill Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gill Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gill Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gill Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gill Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gill Brown. The network helps show where Gill Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Gill Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 96 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 0 |
About Gill Brown
Gill Brown is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (41 citations), Clinical Psychology (126 citations), General Health Professions (122 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (42 citations) and Health (22 citations). Gill Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Waquas Waheed, Max Marshall, Peter Bower, Adrine Woodham, Amy Leigh Rathbone, Julie Prescott, Simone Farrelly, Graham Thornicroft, George Szmukler and Max Birchwood. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Clinical Trials, Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, Digital Health, Psychiatry Research and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.