Kate Beamer

547 citations
4 papers · 334 · 1 hit paper · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Kate Beamer

4 papers receiving 318 citations

Kate Beamer's Hit Papers

Sympathy, empathy, and compassion: A grounded theory study of palliative care patients’ understandings, experiences, and preferences 2016 · 311 citations
3110+3+6Years since publication100200300

Peers

Kate Beamer
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Research and Theory 10
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 50
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 97
  • General Health Professions 146
  • Clinical Psychology 116
Replace Rachel Burbeck with:
Rachel Burbeck United Kingdom
Lorraine Perry United Kingdom
António Barbosa da Silva Sweden
Peng-Chih Wang Taiwan
Sebastian Gabrielsson Sweden
Laura Rabbi Italy
Gaia Cetrano United Kingdom
Marleen Prins Netherlands
Peter Kevern United Kingdom
Anne Kari Tolo Heggestad Norway
Kate Beamer relative to Rachel Burbeck United Kingdom Rachel Burbeck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Rachel Burbeck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Beamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Beamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Beamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Beamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Beamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Beamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Beamer. The network helps show where Kate Beamer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Kate Beamer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Beamer Line = papers co-authored together Kate Beamer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
#Work
1
Sympathy, empathy, and compassion: A grounded theory study of palliative care patients’ understandings, experiences, and preferences
Hit paper breakdown →
2016311
2 201613
3
E-learning Access, Opportunities, and Challenges for Aboriginal Adult Learners Located in Rural Communities
20128
4 20172

About Kate Beamer

Kate Beamer is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 4 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education Systems and Policy (1 paper), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper), Cancer survivorship and care (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (1 paper), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (1 paper), Service-Learning and Community Engagement (1 paper) and Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (10 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (50 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (97 citations), General Health Professions (146 citations) and Clinical Psychology (116 citations). Kate Beamer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Shane Sinclair, Neil A. Hagen, Harvey Max Chochinov, Thomas F. Hack, Shelley Raffin Bouchal, Susan McClement, Tak Fung and Shelley Raffin‐Bouchal. Their work appears in journals such as Palliative Medicine, Oncology nursing forum, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The College Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact