Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

16.1k citations
750 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

705 papers receiving 13.6k citations

Peers

Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Comparison fields: 5 of 192
  • Safety Research 3.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 5.6k
  • Occupational Therapy 784
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 4.1k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.5k
Replace Intellectual and developmental disabilities with:
Intellectual and developmental disabilities United States
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities United Kingdom
Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability Australia
American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities United States
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development United States
Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health United Kingdom
Journal of Disability Policy Studies United States
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy United States
Health Psychology Review United Kingdom
European Psychologist Germany
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities relative to Intellectual and developmental disabilities United States Intellectual and developmental disabilities's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Intellectual and developmental disabilities · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities.

About Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

The 750 papers published in Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities in the last decades have received a total of 16.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities usually cover Safety Research (209 papers), Clinical Psychology (344 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (299 papers), Occupational Therapy (41 papers) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (28 papers) specifically the topics of Family and Disability Support Research (290 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (275 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (140 papers), Disability Education and Employment (120 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (102 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (98 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (61 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities are María del Carmen Malbrán, Joav Merrick, Gideon Vardi, Robert L. Schalock, Carla Vlaskamp, Nancy Jokinen, Roy I. Brown, Han Nakken, Tamar Heller and Ivan Brown.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact