Giles E. Dawson

461 citations
13 papers · 77 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
    • Digital Humanities and Scholarship
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 4
    • Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 2
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 2
    • Historical and Literary Analyses 1
    • Historical and Literary Studies 2

Giles E. Dawson

10 papers receiving 48 citations

Peers

Giles E. Dawson
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Literature and Literary Theory 34
  • Classics 9
  • History 20
  • Museology 5
  • Music 3
Replace T. H. Howard-Hill with:
T. H. Howard-Hill United States
Eugene M. Waith Australia
Philip J. Finkelpearl United States
Roger Lonsdale United Kingdom
Sir Philip Sidney
Peter Ure United Kingdom
Anne Barton United Kingdom
James Sambrook United Kingdom
W. W. Greg
Theodore Spencer United States
Giles E. Dawson relative to T. H. Howard-Hill United States T. H. Howard-Hill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
T. H. Howard-Hill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giles E. Dawson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giles E. Dawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giles E. Dawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giles E. Dawson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giles E. Dawson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giles E. Dawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giles E. Dawson. The network helps show where Giles E. Dawson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Giles E. Dawson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Giles E. Dawson Line = papers co-authored together Giles E. Dawson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 196219
2 199019
3 195815
4
Elizabethan handwriting, 1500-1650 : a guide to the reading of documents and manuscripts
19686
5 19684
6 19563
7 19643
8 19582
9 19652
10 19692
11 19921
12 19571
13 19680

About Giles E. Dawson

Giles E. Dawson is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, History, Classics and Museology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 77 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (1 paper), Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper), Renaissance Literature and Culture (1 paper) and Scottish History and National Identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (34 citations), Classics (9 citations), History (20 citations), Museology (5 citations) and Music (3 citations). Frequent co-authors include Donald W. Foster, W. W. Greg and A. C. F. Beales. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, The Modern Language Review, British Journal of Educational Studies and Faber and Faber eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact