Gilad E. Amiel
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Seth P. Lerner (27 shared papers)Anthony Atala (7 shared papers)Yair Lotan (15 shared papers)Shahrokh François Shariat (15 shared papers)Pierre I. Karakiewicz (14 shared papers)Arthur I. Sagalowsky (11 shared papers)Mark Schoenberg (11 shared papers)Ganesh S. Palapattu (11 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Urology (16 papers)British Journal of Urology (7 papers)European Urology (3 papers)Patient Education and Counseling (2 papers)Academic Medicine (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelCanada
In The Last Decade
Gilad E. Amiel
74 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Gilad E. Amiel's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Urology 355
- Surgery 2.4k
- Biomaterials 555
- Family Practice 24
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 368
Countries citing papers authored by Gilad E. Amiel
This map shows the geographic impact of Gilad E. Amiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilad E. Amiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilad E. Amiel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gilad E. Amiel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilad E. Amiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilad E. Amiel. The network helps show where Gilad E. Amiel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gilad E. Amiel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 722 | |
| 2 | Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy for Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Contemporary Series From the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 576 |
| 3 | 2005 | 254 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 218 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 165 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 140 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 138 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 129 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 85 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 71 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 59 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 53 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 53 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 49 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 46 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 45 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 41 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 38 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 38 |
About Gilad E. Amiel
Gilad E. Amiel is a scholar working on Surgery, Urology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Family Practice and General Health Professions, having authored 80 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (35 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (11 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (8 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (7 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (4 papers) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (355 citations), Surgery (2.4k citations), Biomaterials (555 citations), Family Practice (24 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (368 citations). Gilad E. Amiel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Seth P. Lerner, Anthony Atala, Yair Lotan, Shahrokh François Shariat, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Arthur I. Sagalowsky, Mark Schoenberg, Ganesh S. Palapattu, Amnon Vazina and Patrick J. Bastian. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, British Journal of Urology, European Urology, Patient Education and Counseling and Academic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.