Gerhard Böwerıng

26 papers receiving 110 citations

Peers

Gerhard Böwerıng
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Religious studies 29
  • Political Science and International Relations 91
  • Philosophy 25
  • Sociology and Political Science 81
  • Archeology 18
Replace Ian Richard Netton with:
Ian Richard Netton United Kingdom
Hava Lazarus-Yafeh Israel
Tilman Nagel Germany
Ahmet T. Karamustafa Türkiye
Reuven Firestone United States
Ahmed El Shamsy United States
John Walbridge United States
Louis Massignon France
Sabine Schmidtke Germany
Neal Robinson United Kingdom
Gerhard Böwerıng relative to Ian Richard Netton United Kingdom Ian Richard Netton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Ian Richard Netton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gerhard Böwerıng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gerhard Böwerıng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerhard Böwerıng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerhard Böwerıng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gerhard Böwerıng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerhard Böwerıng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerhard Böwerıng. The network helps show where Gerhard Böwerıng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Gerhard Böwerıng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gerhard Böwerıng Line = papers co-authored together Gerhard Böwerıng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198630
2 198016
3 199413
4 197913
5 199210
6
The Concept of Time in Islam
19979
7 19817
8 20015
9 19965
10 19824
11 20154
12 20014
13 20154
14
Preliminary Observations on Islamic Ethics in the Chinese Context
20123
15 20003
16
Zulme Uğrayan ve İlhadla Suçlanan İlk Sûfîler
20032
17 19872
18 20012
19 19942
20
Sufism, Mystics, and Saints in Modern Egypt
19971

About Gerhard Böwerıng

Gerhard Böwerıng is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Archeology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 147 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (20 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (15 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (10 papers), Families in Therapy and Culture (8 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (5 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (5 papers), Islamic Thought and Society Studies (4 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (29 citations), Political Science and International Relations (91 citations), Philosophy (25 citations), Sociology and Political Science (81 citations) and Archeology (18 citations). Gerhard Böwerıng has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Louis Massignon, Richard M. Eaton, Carl W. Ernst, William C. Chittick, Adam Gacek and Michel Chodkiewicz. Their work appears in journals such as Oriens, The Middle East Journal, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Journal of Near Eastern Studies and Studia Islamica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact