Countries where authors publish in The Middle East Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Middle East Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Middle East Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Middle East Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Middle East Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Middle East Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Middle East Journal.
About The Middle East Journal
The 990 papers published in The Middle East Journal in the last decades have received a total of 7.8k indexed citations . Papers published in The Middle East Journal usually cover Political Science and International Relations (538 papers), Sociology and Political Science (619 papers), General Energy (14 papers), Anthropology (75 papers) and Archeology (7 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (294 papers), Islamic Studies and History (235 papers), Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (226 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (145 papers), Socioeconomic Development in MENA (96 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (92 papers), Turkey's Politics and Society (80 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Middle East Journal are Nilüfer Göle, Mehran Kamrava, Joseph Massad, Ian S. Lustick, William A. Rugh, Mesut Yeğen, J. E. Peterson, Mamoun Fandy, Zahra Babar and Amélie Le Renard.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.