Gerald E. K. Branch

735 citations
7 papers · 66 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

    • Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry 4
    • Synthesis and Biological Evaluation 2
    • Chemical Reaction Mechanisms 2
    • Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 1
    • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 1
    • Various Chemistry Research Topics 2

Gerald E. K. Branch

7 papers receiving 62 citations

Peers

Gerald E. K. Branch
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 14
  • Organic Chemistry 24
  • Toxicology 2
  • Biochemistry 4
  • Spectroscopy 9
Replace James E. LuValle with:
James E. LuValle United States
Oliver Grummitt United States
Ludwig Gattermann
M. G. Van Campen
F. L. Breusch Türkiye
James H. Sterner United States
Herbert K. Alber United States
N. M. Cullinane United Kingdom
Frances M. Hamer
Wadie Tadros Egypt
Gerald E. K. Branch relative to James E. LuValle United States James E. LuValle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James E. LuValle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gerald E. K. Branch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gerald E. K. Branch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerald E. K. Branch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerald E. K. Branch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gerald E. K. Branch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerald E. K. Branch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerald E. K. Branch. The network helps show where Gerald E. K. Branch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Gerald E. K. Branch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gerald E. K. Branch Line = papers co-authored together Gerald E. K. Branch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown

About Gerald E. K. Branch

Gerald E. K. Branch is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Pharmacology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 7 papers that have together received 66 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (4 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (2 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (2 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (2 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (1 paper), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (1 paper), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (1 paper) and Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (14 citations), Organic Chemistry (24 citations), Toxicology (2 citations), Biochemistry (4 citations) and Spectroscopy (9 citations). Gerald E. K. Branch has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jerome F. Thomas, E Ritchie, Lai Yeap Foo and Donald R. Burgess. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Australian Journal of Chemistry and Journal of Chemical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact