Gerald D. Nash

82 papers receiving 610 citations

Peers

Gerald D. Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Marketing 163
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 184
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 107
  • Political Science and International Relations 231
  • Economics and Econometrics 237
Replace Morton J. Horwitz with:
Morton J. Horwitz United States
Roger L. Ransom United States
H. V. Nelles Canada
Harry W. Pearson
Barry Supple United Kingdom
W. Ashworth United Kingdom
Sam Bass Warner United States
Robert Fishman Netherlands
David R. Meyer United States
Gabriel Kolko United States
Gerald D. Nash relative to Morton J. Horwitz United States Morton J. Horwitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Morton J. Horwitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gerald D. Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gerald D. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerald D. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerald D. Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gerald D. Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerald D. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerald D. Nash. The network helps show where Gerald D. Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gerald D. Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gerald D. Nash Line = papers co-authored together Gerald D. Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1969131
2 199978
3 197162
4 197343
5 196840
6 198640
7 197037
8 196529
9 199328
10 196528
11 198726
12 198923
13 198922
14 199321
15 199120
16 197018
17 197416
18 197415
19 197015
20 197914

About Gerald D. Nash

Gerald D. Nash is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (27 papers), American History and Culture (21 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (8 papers), Race, History, and American Society (8 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (3 papers) and Latin American and Latino Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (163 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (184 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (107 citations), Political Science and International Relations (231 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (237 citations). Gerald D. Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Herbert Stein, Hal K. Rothman, Morrell Heald, Roger W. Lotchin, Robert Cuff, Alfred S. Eichner, Thomas Barclay, Ellis W. Hawley, David M. Wrobel and Howard Ball. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, Western Historical Quarterly, The American Historical Review, The Journal of Southern History and Pacific Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact