Georges Daoud

1.9k citations
38 papers · 1.6k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Georges Daoud

38 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Georges Daoud
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 424
  • Reproductive Medicine 202
  • Sensory Systems 75
  • Immunology 184
  • Oncology 158
Replace Madhuri S. Salker with:
Madhuri S. Salker Germany
Felice Arcuri Italy
David Barrera Mexico
Pasquapina Ciarmela Italy
Zhaolian Wei China
Douglas A Gibson United Kingdom
Gudmundur Thórdarson United States
June E. Bishop United States
Fei Pei China
Leonardo Ermini Italy
Georges Daoud relative to Madhuri S. Salker Germany Madhuri S. Salker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Madhuri S. Salker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Georges Daoud

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Georges Daoud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Georges Daoud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georges Daoud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Georges Daoud

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Georges Daoud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Georges Daoud. The network helps show where Georges Daoud may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Georges Daoud, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Georges Daoud Line = papers co-authored together Georges Daoud links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016235
2 2016174
3 2018173
4 2005144
5 200262
6 202261
7 200258
8 201951
9 201549
10 201846
11 200445
12 200943
13 201841
14 200636
15 201435
16 200329
17 201929
18 202027
19 200823
20 202221

About Georges Daoud

Georges Daoud is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Immunology, Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology and Sensory Systems, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (17 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (4 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (2 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (2 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (2 papers) and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (424 citations), Reproductive Medicine (202 citations), Sensory Systems (75 citations), Immunology (184 citations) and Oncology (158 citations). Georges Daoud has collaborated with scholars based in Lebanon, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Wassim G. Abou-Kheir, J. Lafond, Lucie Simoneau, Ola Hadadeh, André Masse, Samer El Hayek, Lynn Bitar, Fadi Mirza, Éric Rassart and Hisham F. Bahmad. Their work appears in journals such as Placenta, PLoS ONE, Biology of Reproduction, Oncotarget and The Journal of Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact