John E. Greivenkamp

81 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

John E. Greivenkamp
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 504
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 248
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 270
  • Media Technology 53
  • Instrumentation 14
Replace David Mas with:
David Mas Spain
Pedro M. Prieto Spain
Julian Bescos Spain
Walter D. Furlan Spain
Vicente Micó Spain
Guang-ming Dai United States
Henryk T. Kasprzak Poland
Guoguang Mu China
Herbert Groß Germany
Dennis Matthews United States
John E. Greivenkamp relative to David Mas Spain David Mas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
David Mas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Greivenkamp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Greivenkamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Greivenkamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Greivenkamp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Greivenkamp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Greivenkamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Greivenkamp. The network helps show where John E. Greivenkamp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Greivenkamp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Greivenkamp Line = papers co-authored together John E. Greivenkamp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004197
2 1995146
3 198792
4 199768
5 199664
6 199560
7 199947
8 200441
9 200437
10 199032
11 200630
12 199625
13 199424
14 199724
15 200123
16 199622
17 200822
18 199621
19 200720
20 199619

About John E. Greivenkamp

John E. Greivenkamp is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Epidemiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical measurement and interference techniques (53 papers), Advanced optical system design (19 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (14 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (8 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (6 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (6 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (5 papers) and Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (504 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (248 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (270 citations), Media Technology (53 citations) and Instrumentation (14 citations). John E. Greivenkamp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Jim T. Schwiegerling, Joseph Michael Miller, Andrew E. Lowman, Robert O. Gappinger, Takamasa Suzuki, Osami Sasaki, Jose M. Sasian, Takanori Endo, James T. Schwiegerling and Hideki Nakamura. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Optics, Optical Engineering, Optics and Photonics News, Optometry and Vision Science and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact