George Letsas

807 citations
20 papers · 138 · h-index 4

Impact in

  • Law top 2%
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
    • European and International Law Studies
    • International Law and Human Rights
    • Political Philosophy and Ethics
    • European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
    • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies

Papers in

    • European and International Law Studies 6
    • Political Philosophy and Ethics 4
    • American Constitutional Law and Politics 4
  • Law 13
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies 6
    • Legal principles and applications 3
    • Religious Freedom and Discrimination 3

George Letsas

13 papers receiving 118 citations

Peers

George Letsas
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Law 77
  • Political Science and International Relations 106
  • Sociology and Political Science 56
  • Philosophy 11
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 12
Replace Bernhard Schlink with:
Bernhard Schlink Germany
Iddo Porat Israel
Grégoire Webber United Kingdom
Grant Lamond United Kingdom
Philip Soper United States
W. J. Waluchow Canada
Michel Troper France
Ed Bates United Kingdom
Jenia Iontcheva Turner United States
D. N. MacCormick United Kingdom
George Letsas relative to Bernhard Schlink Germany Bernhard Schlink's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bernhard Schlink · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Letsas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Letsas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Letsas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Letsas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Letsas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Letsas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Letsas. The network helps show where George Letsas may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200796
2 201211
3 20148
4 20186
5
The Scope and Balancing of Rights: Diagnostic or Constitutive?
20132
6 20152
7 20172
8 20242
9 20182
10 20112
11 20131
12 20151
13 20161
14 20091
15 20111
16
The Truth in Autonomous Concepts: How To Interpret the ECHR
20080
17 20240
18 20220
19 20180
20 20170

About George Letsas

George Letsas is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 138 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European and International Law Studies (6 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Legal principles and applications (3 papers), Religious Freedom and Discrimination (3 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (77 citations), Political Science and International Relations (106 citations), Sociology and Political Science (56 citations), Philosophy (11 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (12 citations). George Letsas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Constitutional Law, Law and Philosophy, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Journal of Applied Philosophy and Current Legal Problems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact