Evan Fox-Decent

511 citations
30 papers · 179 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Evan Fox-Decent

23 papers receiving 139 citations

Peers

Evan Fox-Decent
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Law 69
  • Political Science and International Relations 96
  • Philosophy 23
  • Sociology and Political Science 58
  • Strategy and Management 17
Replace G.C.G.J. van Roermund with:
G.C.G.J. van Roermund Netherlands
George Letsas United Kingdom
Pavlos Eleftheriadis United Kingdom
Oliver Lepsius Germany
David M. Beatty Canada
Jenia Iontcheva Turner United States
Grégoire Webber United Kingdom
Michel van de Kerchove Belgium
Matthias Klatt Austria
Gunnar Beck United Kingdom
Evan Fox-Decent relative to G.C.G.J. van Roermund Netherlands G.C.G.J. van Roermund's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
G.C.G.J. van Roermund · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Evan Fox-Decent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Evan Fox-Decent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evan Fox-Decent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evan Fox-Decent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Evan Fox-Decent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evan Fox-Decent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evan Fox-Decent. The network helps show where Evan Fox-Decent may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Evan Fox-Decent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Evan Fox-Decent Line = papers co-authored together Evan Fox-Decent links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201237
2 201127
3
Sovereignty's Promise: The State as Fiduciary
201124
4
A Fiduciary Theory of Jus Cogens
200819
5 201616
6 20149
7 20198
8
Fiduciaries of Humanity: How International Law Constitutes Authority
20168
9 20126
10 20095
11 20083
12 20182
13 20012
14 20182
15 20172
16 20161
17 20141
18 20181
19 20201
20 20111

About Evan Fox-Decent

Evan Fox-Decent is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 179 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal principles and applications (14 papers), International Law and Human Rights (9 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (5 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (4 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (3 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (3 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (69 citations), Political Science and International Relations (96 citations), Philosophy (23 citations), Sociology and Political Science (58 citations) and Strategy and Management (17 citations). Evan Fox-Decent has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include David Dyzenhaus, Rebecca Lee, Jens-Hinrich Binder, Jennifer G. Hill and Paul B. W. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Human Rights Quarterly, American Journal of International Law, Legal Theory, Law and Philosophy and Theoretical Inquiries in Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact