Countries where authors publish in Current Legal Problems
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Legal Problems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Legal Problems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Legal Problems more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Current Legal Problems
This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Legal Problems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Legal Problems.
About Current Legal Problems
The 633 papers published in Current Legal Problems in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Legal Problems usually cover Law (330 papers), Political Science and International Relations (249 papers), Strategy and Management (57 papers), Accounting (35 papers) and Pharmacy (14 papers) specifically the topics of Legal principles and applications (187 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (88 papers), International Law and Human Rights (51 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (50 papers), European and International Contract Law (49 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (45 papers), Law in Society and Culture (45 papers) and European and International Law Studies (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Legal Problems are Julia Black, Georg Schwarzenberger, Michael Freeman, Lucia Zedner, Philip Schofield, Genevra Richardson, David Nelken, Nicola Lacey, Glanville L. Williams and Rosemary Hunter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.