George E. Trapp

31 papers receiving 893 citations

Peers

George E. Trapp
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 406
  • Applied Mathematics 242
  • Numerical Analysis 64
  • Mathematical Physics 128
  • Modeling and Simulation 33
Replace A. J. Pritchard with:
A. J. Pritchard United Kingdom
André Galligo A France
Heinrich Voß Germany
Giuseppe Buttazzo Italy
P. J. Laurent France
Paul Nelson United States
Hans Wilhelm Alt Germany
John A. Gregory United States
Hartmut Prautzsch Germany
T. N. T. Goodman United Kingdom
George E. Trapp relative to A. J. Pritchard United Kingdom A. J. Pritchard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
A. J. Pritchard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George E. Trapp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George E. Trapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George E. Trapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George E. Trapp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George E. Trapp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George E. Trapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George E. Trapp. The network helps show where George E. Trapp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside George E. Trapp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George E. Trapp Line = papers co-authored together George E. Trapp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998419
2 1975184
3 1990103
4 198337
5 197928
6 198428
7 199721
8 197519
9 197218
10 197218
11
INVERSES OF CIRCULANT MATRICES AND BLOCK CIRCULANT MATRICES
197316
12 198416
13 198515
14 197510
15 19868
16 19938
17 19757
18 19787
19 19997
20 19876

About George E. Trapp

George E. Trapp is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (20 papers), Mathematical Inequalities and Applications (10 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (4 papers), Graph theory and applications (3 papers), Engineering and Technology Innovations (2 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (2 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (2 papers) and Mathematical and Computational Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (406 citations), Applied Mathematics (242 citations), Numerical Analysis (64 citations), Mathematical Physics (128 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (33 citations). George E. Trapp has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include William Squire, William N. Anderson, Thomas D. Morley, R. J. Duffin, William F. Klostermeyer, Sujit Kumar Mitra, E. James Harner, John W. Bunce, T. Andô and V. Jagannathan. Their work appears in journals such as Linear Algebra and its Applications, Journal of the Franklin Institute, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Computer Journal and SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact