George Cawkwell
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Classics top 5%
- Byzantine Studies and History
Papers in
- Anthropology 27
- Classical Antiquity Studies 27
- Archeology 10
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 5
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 2
- Ancient Near East History 2
- Co-authors
- Mark Toher (1 shared paper)Michael A. Flower (1 shared paper)Rex Warner (1 shared paper)Xénophon (1 shared paper)D. A. Russell (1 shared paper)John Dillon (1 shared paper)Plutarch (1 shared paper)Robert Dale Parker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Classical Quarterly (13 papers)Phoenix (3 papers)Revue des Études Grecques (3 papers)Mnemosyne (2 papers)The Journal of Hellenic Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
George Cawkwell
29 papers receiving 114 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Anthropology 162
- Classics 35
- Archeology 83
- General Arts and Humanities 3
- Philosophy 24
Countries citing papers authored by George Cawkwell
This map shows the geographic impact of George Cawkwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Cawkwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Cawkwell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Cawkwell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Cawkwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Cawkwell. The network helps show where George Cawkwell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside George Cawkwell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Philip of Macedon | 1978 | 24 |
| 2 | 1995 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 16 | |
| 5 | Georgica : Greek studies in honour of George Cawkwell | 1991 | 13 |
| 6 | 1981 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1976 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1973 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1963 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1962 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1969 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1961 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1978 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1960 | 4 | |
| 18 | Untersuchungen zu der Zeit der thebanischen Hegemonie | 1970 | 4 |
| 19 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1976 | 4 |
About George Cawkwell
George Cawkwell is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Classics, Organic Chemistry and Religious studies, having authored 37 papers that have together received 204 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (27 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (6 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers), Ancient Near East History (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers) and Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (162 citations), Classics (35 citations), Archeology (83 citations), General Arts and Humanities (3 citations) and Philosophy (24 citations). George Cawkwell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark Toher, Michael A. Flower, Rex Warner, Xénophon, D. A. Russell, John Dillon, Plutarch, Robert Dale Parker and Christopher Pelling. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical Quarterly, Phoenix, Revue des Études Grecques, Mnemosyne and The Journal of Hellenic Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.