Mark Toher
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Classics top 10%
- Byzantine Studies and History
Papers in
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 9
-
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 3
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 3
- Co-authors
- George Cawkwell (1 shared paper)Michael A. Flower (1 shared paper)Alain M. Gowing (1 shared paper)Richard F. Thomas (1 shared paper)S. P. Oakley (1 shared paper)Paul Cartledge (1 shared paper)A. R. Birley (1 shared paper)A. J. Woodman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Classical Quarterly (3 papers)Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (2 papers)Hermes (2 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)Philologus (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark Toher
12 papers receiving 124 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Anthropology 201
- Classics 46
- Archeology 110
- Philosophy 64
- Religious studies 12
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Toher
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Toher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Toher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Toher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Toher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Toher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Toher. The network helps show where Mark Toher may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Mark Toher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 123 | |
| 2 | Georgica : Greek studies in honour of George Cawkwell | 1991 | 69 |
| 3 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 7 | |
| 6 | Euripides' supplices and the social function of funeral ritual | 2001 | 5 |
| 7 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 14 | The Date of Nicolaus’ Βίος Καίσαρος | 2004 | 0 |
| 15 | Herod's Last Days | 2011 | 0 |
| 16 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 0 |
About Mark Toher
Mark Toher is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies and Classics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (9 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper), Social and Cultural Studies (1 paper) and Augustinian Studies and Theology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (201 citations), Classics (46 citations), Archeology (110 citations), Philosophy (64 citations) and Religious studies (12 citations). Mark Toher has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George Cawkwell, Michael A. Flower, Alain M. Gowing, Richard F. Thomas, S. P. Oakley, Paul Cartledge, A. R. Birley, A. J. Woodman, Rhiannon Ash and Christopher Pelling. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical Quarterly, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, Hermes, The American Historical Review and Philologus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.