Geoff C. Smith

28 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers

Geoff C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 93
  • Reproductive Medicine 126
  • Theoretical Computer Science 16
  • Geometry and Topology 118
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 39
Replace Daniel B. Shapiro with:
Daniel B. Shapiro United States
David B. Bernstein United States
Kazuo Kishimoto Japan
Martha Smith United States
Jerzy Kaczorowski Poland
E. Becker France
Alberto Perelli Italy
Ken-Ichi Nakamura Japan
Zdenĕk Dvořák Czechia
Geoff C. Smith relative to Daniel B. Shapiro United States Daniel B. Shapiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Daniel B. Shapiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geoff C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geoff C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoff C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoff C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geoff C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoff C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoff C. Smith. The network helps show where Geoff C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Geoff C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Geoff C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Geoff C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988211
2 1999156
3 198878
4 200258
5 200244
6 200342
7 199430
8 199925
9 201623
10 199912
11
Fibonacci Sequences in Finite Nilpotent Groups
19979
12 19859
13 19939
14
Statics and the moduli space of triangles
20058
15 20007
16 20006
17 20226
18 19805
19 20075
20 19833

About Geoff C. Smith

Geoff C. Smith is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Theoretical Computer Science, Algebra and Number Theory and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 34 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematics and Applications (7 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (6 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (5 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (4 papers), Odor and Emission Control Technologies (3 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (3 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (3 papers) and Geometric and Algebraic Topology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (93 citations), Reproductive Medicine (126 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (16 citations), Geometry and Topology (118 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (39 citations). Geoff C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include William Bains, T.M. Jefferies, Ryan Potts, Lidia J. Notarianni, Fritz Grunewald, Dan Segal, Philip D. Nightingale, Stephen D. Archer, Peter Burkill and J. P. Cox. Their work appears in journals such as Historia Mathematica, Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Research Policy and Transfusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact