Gemma Smith

9 papers receiving 173 citations

Peers

Gemma Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Public Administration 11
  • Water Science and Technology 23
  • Global and Planetary Change 26
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 10
  • Sociology and Political Science 39
Replace Davison Muchadenyika with:
Davison Muchadenyika South Africa
Catherine Baron France
Andrea Marston United States
B. Timothy Heinmiller Canada
Luisa Moretto Belgium
Siobhán Mcinerney-Lankford United States
José Manuel Echavarren Spain
Kirsten H. Engel United States
Michael C. Blumm United States
Alicia Dailey Cooperman United States
Gemma Smith relative to Davison Muchadenyika South Africa Davison Muchadenyika's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Davison Muchadenyika · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Smith. The network helps show where Gemma Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Smith Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 200448
2 202138
3 202126
4 202020
5 201917
6 202217
7 20237
8
New EMS Palliative Care/DNR protocol will replace existing hospice protocol.
19954
9 20252
10 20250
11 20260

About Gemma Smith

Gemma Smith is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Water Science and Technology, Global and Planetary Change, Public Administration and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 179 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (2 papers), Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies (2 papers), Transboundary Water Resource Management (1 paper), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (1 paper), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (1 paper), Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation (1 paper), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (1 paper) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (11 citations), Water Science and Technology (23 citations), Global and Planetary Change (26 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (10 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (39 citations). Gemma Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Iris S. Hui, Courtney Hammond Wagner, Laura S. P. Bloomfield, Kira A. Sullivan-Wiley, Newsha Ajami, Gabrielle Wong‐Parodi, Adriana A. Zúñiga-Terán, Robert Gabriel Varady, Andrea K. Gerlak and Theodore Henry Shear. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Policy, Climatic Change, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, International Journal of the Commons and Environmental Policy and Governance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact