James Smith

66 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Emergency Medical Services 101
  • General Health Professions 304
  • Clinical Psychology 238
  • Virology 43
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 133
Replace Haja Ramatulai Wurie with:
Haja Ramatulai Wurie Sierra Leone
Giuliano Russo United Kingdom
Sharmila Devi India
Sarah Gimbel United States
Miriam Lewis Sabin United States
Adriano Massuda Brazil
Carel IJsselmuiden South Africa
Carlos E. Rodríguez-Díaz United States
Arush Lal United Kingdom
Christine McNab United States
James Smith relative to Haja Ramatulai Wurie Sierra Leone Haja Ramatulai Wurie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
Haja Ramatulai Wurie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Smith. The network helps show where James Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Smith Line = papers co-authored together James Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017198
2 202186
3 201884
4 201972
5 201964
6 200952
7 202050
8 201849
9 201849
10 201939
11 201733
12 201532
13 202030
14 201728
15 201526
16
The Limits to Governance: The Challenge of Policy-Making for the New Life Sciences
200923
17 200122
18 202220
19 202417
20 202317

About James Smith

James Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Emergency Medical Services, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health and Conflict Studies (18 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (13 papers), Global Security and Public Health (6 papers), Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (5 papers), Disaster Response and Management (4 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers), Political Systems and Governance (4 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (101 citations), General Health Professions (304 citations), Clinical Psychology (238 citations), Virology (43 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (133 citations). James Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Karl Blanchet, Bayard Roberts, Lachlan J. McIver, Julien Potet, Neha Singh, Rajat Khosla, Lale Say, Kiran Jobanputra, Abigail C. Knight and Tammam Aloudat. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, The Lancet Global Health, BMJ Global Health, Journal of Public Health and Journal of Migration and Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact