Gemma Sansa
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Sleep and Wakefulness Research
-
- Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Papers in
-
- Sleep and Wakefulness Research 5
-
- Epilepsy research and treatment 2
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments 1
- Co-authors
- Joan Santamaría (5 shared papers)Álex Iranzo (4 shared papers)A. Molins (4 shared papers)Juan Luís Becerra (3 shared papers)Miguel Ley (2 shared papers)Mercè Falip (2 shared papers)Júlia Miró (2 shared papers)Carles Gaig (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Epilepsy & Behavior (2 papers)Sleep Medicine (2 papers)Seizure (1 paper)Epilepsia (1 paper)BMC Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gemma Sansa
12 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Cognitive Neuroscience 152
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 43
- Psychiatry and Mental health 76
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 71
- Neurology 68
Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Sansa
This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Sansa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Sansa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Sansa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Sansa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Sansa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Sansa. The network helps show where Gemma Sansa may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Sansa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 90 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 11 | The use of cyclofenil in menopausal women. | 1977 | 3 |
| 12 | 2013 | 1 |
About Gemma Sansa
Gemma Sansa is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper), Restless Legs Syndrome Research (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments (1 paper) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (152 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (43 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (76 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (71 citations) and Neurology (68 citations). Gemma Sansa has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joan Santamaría, Álex Iranzo, A. Molins, Juan Luís Becerra, Miguel Ley, Mercè Falip, Júlia Miró, Carles Gaig, Mar Carreño and William Barr. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsy & Behavior, Sleep Medicine, Seizure, Epilepsia and BMC Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.