Gemma L. Mitchell
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 3
-
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 3
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey M. Brunstrom (5 shared papers)Emma Haycraft (2 shared papers)Claire Farrow (2 shared papers)Caroline Meyer (1 shared paper)Charles Crook (1 shared paper)Suzanne Higgs (1 shared paper)Simon M. Collin (1 shared paper)Natalie Dodd (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Appetite (3 papers)Physiology & Behavior (2 papers)Cambridge Journal of Education (1 paper)Current Obesity Reports (1 paper)Industrial Law Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Gemma L. Mitchell
10 papers receiving 485 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Sensory Systems 59
- Library and Information Sciences 19
- Clinical Psychology 156
- Nutrition and Dietetics 103
- Psychiatry and Mental health 91
Countries citing papers authored by Gemma L. Mitchell
This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma L. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma L. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma L. Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma L. Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma L. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma L. Mitchell. The network helps show where Gemma L. Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Gemma L. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 206 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 106 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 13 | |
| 8 | Carers' perceptions of pain in people with dementia: a grounded theory approach. | 2004 | 9 |
| 9 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 6 |
About Gemma L. Mitchell
Gemma L. Mitchell is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Online and Blended Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (59 citations), Library and Information Sciences (19 citations), Clinical Psychology (156 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (103 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (91 citations). Gemma L. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey M. Brunstrom, Emma Haycraft, Claire Farrow, Caroline Meyer, Charles Crook, Suzanne Higgs, Simon M. Collin, Natalie Dodd, Marit Helen Andersen and Amy Ramsay. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Physiology & Behavior, Cambridge Journal of Education, Current Obesity Reports and Industrial Law Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.