Gemma Gladstone

2.3k citations
32 papers · 1.7k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Gemma Gladstone

32 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Gemma Gladstone
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Clinical Psychology 806
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 101
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 296
  • Social Psychology 457
  • Biological Psychiatry 38
Replace René Carbonneau with:
René Carbonneau Canada
Michael Lucht Germany
Laura J. Dietz United States
Valerie Dunn United Kingdom
Patrick Pössel United States
Jacqueline G.F.M. Hovens Netherlands
Jeremy G. Stewart United States
Timothy C. Blackson United States
et al United States
Francheska Perepletchikova United States
Gemma Gladstone relative to René Carbonneau Canada René Carbonneau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
René Carbonneau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Gladstone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Gladstone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Gladstone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Gladstone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Gladstone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Gladstone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Gladstone. The network helps show where Gemma Gladstone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Gladstone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Gladstone Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Gladstone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001368
2 2004252
3 2006210
4 2005107
5 199988
6 199986
7 200478
8 200568
9 200659
10 200641
11 200341
12 200138
13 200732
14 200231
15 199830
16 199728
17 200024
18 200017
19 199615
20 199812

About Gemma Gladstone

Gemma Gladstone is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pharmacology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (806 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (101 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (296 citations), Social Psychology (457 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (38 citations). Gemma Gladstone has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Gordon Parker, Gin S. Malhi, Kay Wilhelm, Kuan Tsee Chee, Philip B. Mitchell, Marie‐Paule Austin, Julie Roussos, Dušan Hadži-Pavlović, Kerrie Eyers and Lucy A. Tully. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, American Journal of Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research and Psychological Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact