Geetha Samak

20 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Geetha Samak
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Neurology 234
  • Biological Psychiatry 25
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 111
  • Food Science 131
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 114
Replace Xin Ran with:
Xin Ran China
R. K. Rao United States
A. Banan United States
Guiqiu Hu China
Hayet Rafa Algeria
Rui Zhao China
Valentina Volynets Germany
Dewei He China
Narges Tajik Iran
Geetha Samak relative to Xin Ran China Xin Ran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×70×
Xin Ran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geetha Samak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geetha Samak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geetha Samak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geetha Samak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geetha Samak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geetha Samak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geetha Samak. The network helps show where Geetha Samak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Geetha Samak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Geetha Samak Line = papers co-authored together Geetha Samak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2013217
2 201288
3 201486
4 201184
5 201359
6 200956
7 201455
8 201054
9 200854
10 201153
11 201552
12 202151
13 201147
14 201636
15 201129
16 202110
17
HYPOLIPIDEMIC EFFICACY OF OCIMUM SANCTUM IN THE PREVENTION OF ATHEROGENESIS IN MALE ALBINO RABBITS
20078
18
INHIBITION OF METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS BY BOTANICAL EXTRACTS OF WAGATEA SPICATA
20122
19 20151
20 20091

About Geetha Samak

Geetha Samak is a scholar working on Neurology, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Food Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Barrier Structure and Function Studies (13 papers), Connexins and lens biology (8 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (3 papers), Gut microbiota and health (3 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (2 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (2 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (234 citations), Biological Psychiatry (25 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (111 citations), Food Science (131 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (114 citations). Geetha Samak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Radhakrishna Rao, Kamaljit Kaur Chaudhry, R. K. Rao, Ankur Seth, Damodaran Narayanan, Jonathan H. Jaggar, Takuya Suzuki, Ruchika Gangwar, Sudhir Aggarwal and PRADEEP KUMAR SHUKLA. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Biochemical Journal, Scientific Reports, Tissue Barriers and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact