Jules Holroyd

1.2k citations
37 papers · 495 · h-index 14

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 2%
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
    • Free Will and Agency

Papers in

Jules Holroyd

33 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

Jules Holroyd
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Philosophy 135
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 204
  • Sociology and Political Science 272
  • Social Psychology 92
  • Gender Studies 39
Replace Tamar Schapiro with:
Tamar Schapiro United States
Sarah Buss United States
Shauna M. Bowes United States
Ivar R. Hannikainen Spain
Kate Abramson United States
Nafsika Athanassoulis United Kingdom
Holly M. Smith United States
Nathan Ballantyne United States
Paul Faulkner United Kingdom
Mirosław Kofta Poland
Jules Holroyd relative to Tamar Schapiro United States Tamar Schapiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Tamar Schapiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jules Holroyd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jules Holroyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jules Holroyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jules Holroyd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jules Holroyd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jules Holroyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jules Holroyd. The network helps show where Jules Holroyd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jules Holroyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jules Holroyd Line = papers co-authored together Jules Holroyd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012102
2 201749
3 201440
4 201730
5 200930
6 201229
7 201625
8 202022
9 201619
10 201018
11 201618
12 200714
13 201214
14 201513
15 202112
16 201010
17 20179
18 20206
19 20235
20 20234

About Jules Holroyd

Jules Holroyd is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy and Social Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (15 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (12 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Free Will and Agency (10 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers) and Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (135 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (204 citations), Sociology and Political Science (272 citations), Social Psychology (92 citations) and Gender Studies (39 citations). Jules Holroyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Tom Stafford, Daniel Kelly, Joseph Sweetman, Jennifer Saul, Erin Beeghly and Fiona Woollard. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy Compass, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Philosophical Topics, Journal of the American Philosophical Association and Journal of Moral Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact