Jules Holroyd

1.1k citations
25 papers · 336 · h-index 11

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
    • Free Will and Agency

Papers in

Jules Holroyd

22 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Jules Holroyd
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Philosophy 88
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 138
  • Sociology and Political Science 196
  • Social Psychology 68
  • Gender Studies 30
Replace Marina Oshana with:
Marina Oshana United States
Douglas A. Pryer
Stephen P. Garvey United States
Tamar Schapiro United States
Jessica Wolfendale Australia
Igor Primoratz Israel
Nafsika Athanassoulis United Kingdom
D.E.M. Verweij Netherlands
Kate Abramson United States
Nick Smith United States
Jules Holroyd relative to Marina Oshana United States Marina Oshana's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Marina Oshana · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jules Holroyd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jules Holroyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jules Holroyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jules Holroyd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jules Holroyd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jules Holroyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jules Holroyd. The network helps show where Jules Holroyd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Jules Holroyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jules Holroyd Line = papers co-authored together Jules Holroyd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201290
2 201742
3 201436
4 201728
5 200926
6 201617
7 201015
8 200714
9 201212
10 202111
11 201511
12 20109
13 20206
14 20233
15 20103
16 20223
17 20182
18 20112
19 20182
20 20251

About Jules Holroyd

Jules Holroyd is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and Social Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Free Will and Agency (7 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (7 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (138 citations), Sociology and Political Science (196 citations), Social Psychology (68 citations) and Gender Studies (30 citations). Jules Holroyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Tom Stafford, Erin Beeghly, Jennifer Saul and Fiona Woollard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Philosophy, Philosophy Compass, Philosophical Papers, Res Publica and Philosophical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact