Ben Mepham

21 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers

Ben Mepham
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Small Animals 55
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 32
  • Business and International Management 6
  • Animal Science and Zoology 27
  • Genetics 67
Replace Henk Verhoog with:
Henk Verhoog Netherlands
Bernice Bovenkerk Netherlands
Faiçal Akaichi United Kingdom
Gemma Harper United Kingdom
Karsten Klint Jensen Denmark
Jorgelina Di Pasquale Italy
Marie von Meyer-Höfer Germany
Marcus Mergenthaler Germany
Jocelyne Porcher France
Kathleen R. Brooks United States
Ben Mepham relative to Henk Verhoog Netherlands Henk Verhoog's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Henk Verhoog · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Mepham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Mepham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Mepham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Mepham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Mepham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Mepham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Mepham. The network helps show where Ben Mepham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Ben Mepham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Mepham Line = papers co-authored together Ben Mepham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000115
2
Bioethics: An Introduction for the Biosciences
200542
3 201131
4 200728
5 200028
6
Ethical Matrix Manual
200625
7 201220
8
The secretion of milk
197616
9 200114
10 20008
11 19967
12
Ethical bio-technology assessment tools for agriculture and food production
20067
13 20046
14 19765
15
Ethical Delphi Manual
20065
16 20123
17
The equation between food production, nutrition and health.
19962
18
Ethical issues in agricultural and food research policy.
19962
19 19732
20 20131

About Ben Mepham

Ben Mepham is a scholar working on Plant Science, Sociology and Political Science, Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetically Modified Organisms Research (3 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (2 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (2 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (2 papers), Protein purification and stability (1 paper), Zoonotic diseases and public health (1 paper) and Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (55 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (32 citations), Business and International Management (6 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (27 citations) and Genetics (67 citations). Ben Mepham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kate Millar, Erik Thorstensen, Matthias Kaiser, Stephen Davis, Andy Peters, Kebreab Ghebremeskel, Julia E. Kohn, V. Beekman, H.C.M. de Bakker and Peter Sandøe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, British Medical Bulletin, Clinica Chimica Acta, Biochemical Journal and Meat Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact