Gail E. Gates

58 papers receiving 751 citations

Peers

Gail E. Gates
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Health Information Management 122
  • Pharmacy 67
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 219
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 208
  • General Health Professions 178
Replace Laura S. Sims with:
Laura S. Sims United States
Andrea Begley Australia
Barbara Shannon United States
Jamie Dollahite United States
Alison Tumilowicz Switzerland
Ellen Schuster United States
Claudia Probart United States
Y. Bronner United States
Leslie Cunningham‐Sabo United States
Nurgül Fitzgerald United States
Gail E. Gates relative to Laura S. Sims United States Laura S. Sims's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Laura S. Sims · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gail E. Gates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gail E. Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail E. Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail E. Gates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gail E. Gates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail E. Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail E. Gates. The network helps show where Gail E. Gates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Gail E. Gates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gail E. Gates Line = papers co-authored together Gail E. Gates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Fam ily Eco nom ics and Nu tri tion Re view
1999183
2 201683
3 200654
4 199343
5 201542
6 200336
7 201734
8 199730
9 202126
10 200121
11 202021
12 201519
13 201916
14 200816
15 200116
16 200115
17 199313
18 199512
19 199812
20 199812

About Gail E. Gates

Gail E. Gates is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Nutrition and Dietetics, Health Information Management and Physiology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 847 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (19 papers), Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education (14 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (8 papers), Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (7 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (6 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (4 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (4 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (122 citations), Pharmacy (67 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (219 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (208 citations) and General Health Professions (178 citations). Gail E. Gates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Madagascar and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include Barbara J. Stoecker, Deana Hildebrand, Hasina Rakotomanana, Carol Kramer, Alan Mathios, Richard P. Dowdy, Lenka H. Shriver, Mary G. McDonald, Yewelsew Abebe and Kathryn S. Keim. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, Current Developments in Nutrition, The FASEB Journal, Maternal and Child Nutrition and Public Health Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact