G. Stange

48 papers receiving 441 citations

Peers

G. Stange
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Speech and Hearing 176
  • Sensory Systems 106
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 143
  • Otorhinolaryngology 25
  • Neurology 39
Replace David M. Lipscomb with:
David M. Lipscomb United States
C. Brahe Pedersen Denmark
Larry H. Royster United States
Tom Frank United States
Jerry V. Tobias United States
Christian Meyer-Bisch France
Jesper Hvass Schmidt Denmark
Sanjay Munjal India
Adam Dudarewicz Poland
James C. Nixon United States
G. Stange relative to David M. Lipscomb United States David M. Lipscomb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
David M. Lipscomb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Stange

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Stange's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Stange with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Stange more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Stange

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Stange. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Stange. The network helps show where G. Stange may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside G. Stange, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Stange Line = papers co-authored together G. Stange links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Ear damage caused by leisure noise.
2001192
2 197631
3 199921
4 196421
5 196618
6
[Quantitative studies on the auditory threshold, adaptation and sound perception in healthy subjects and in hearing disorders by means of "objective audiometry"].
196814
7 196813
8 197111
9
[THE EFFECT OF STREPTOMYCIN SULFATE ON THE EXCITATION AND ADAPTATION OF HAIR CELLS IN CORTI'S ORGAN].
196411
10 196510
11 19778
12 19637
13 20017
14 19677
15
[Adaptation--a criterium in the function of the acoustic sense system].
19667
16 20096
17 19726
18 19676
19 19666
20 19675

About G. Stange

G. Stange is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Otorhinolaryngology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (7 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (5 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Noise Effects and Management (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers) and Color perception and design (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (176 citations), Sensory Systems (106 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (143 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (25 citations) and Neurology (39 citations). G. Stange has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Australia. Frequent co-authors include M. Spreng, P Plath, Wolfgang Babisch, K. D. Bachmann, H Ising, Marcus M. Maassen, P. K. Plinkert, E Rebentisch, Chl. Beck and Lars Schaade. Their work appears in journals such as European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology and HNO.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact