David M. Lipscomb

27 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

David M. Lipscomb
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Sensory Systems 163
  • Speech and Hearing 187
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 176
  • Developmental Biology 9
  • Neurology 32
Replace G. Stange with:
G. Stange Germany
E Rebentisch Germany
John R. Franks United States
J. P. Legouix France
Larry H. Royster United States
William Melnick United States
James C. Nixon United States
Roy W. Gengel United States
Derek E. Dunn United States
G. Richard Price United States
David M. Lipscomb relative to G. Stange Germany G. Stange's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
G. Stange · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David M. Lipscomb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Lipscomb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Lipscomb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Lipscomb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Lipscomb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Lipscomb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Lipscomb. The network helps show where David M. Lipscomb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside David M. Lipscomb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David M. Lipscomb Line = papers co-authored together David M. Lipscomb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197487
2
Wind turbine sound and health effects : an expert panel review
200963
3 197329
4 197227
5 196927
6 197927
7 197725
8 197725
9
Noise and audiology
197817
10 197215
11 197515
12 196913
13 197911
14 197310
15
Wind Turbine Sound and Health Effects
20096
16 19726
17 19754
18 19793
19 19733
20
Auditory Perceptual Factors Influencing the Audibility of Train Horns
19952

About David M. Lipscomb

David M. Lipscomb is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Ecology and Automotive Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Noise Effects and Management (16 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Marine animal studies overview (2 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (2 papers), Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control (2 papers), Safety Warnings and Signage (2 papers) and Transportation Systems and Infrastructure (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (163 citations), Speech and Hearing (187 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (176 citations), Developmental Biology (9 citations) and Neurology (32 citations). David M. Lipscomb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include A. Axelsson, D. Vertes, Geoff Leventhall, Robert A. Dobie, Robert J. McCunney, G. E. SHAMBAUGH and J. A. Carroll. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America and International Journal of Audiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact