G. King
Impact in
- Pharmaceutical Science top 1%
- Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Dermatology top 5%
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Papers in
-
- Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior 9
- Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling 2
- ATP Synthase and ATPases Research 1
-
- Surfactants and Colloidal Systems 3
- Co-authors
- Stephen H. White (7 shared papers)Dorla Mirejovsky (1 shared paper)C.R. Worthington (3 shared papers)Russell E. Jacobs (2 shared papers)Michael C. Wiener (1 shared paper)Thomas J. McIntosh (1 shared paper)B. P. Schoenborn (2 shared papers)A.E. Blaurock (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biophysical Journal (4 papers)Nature (2 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Biochemistry (2 papers)Physics Letters A (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
G. King
14 papers receiving 980 citations
G. King's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Pharmaceutical Science 302
- Dermatology 133
- Molecular Biology 748
- Organic Chemistry 232
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 131
Countries citing papers authored by G. King
This map shows the geographic impact of G. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. King. The network helps show where G. King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside G. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Structure of lamellar lipid domains and corneocyte envelopes of murine stratum corneum. An x-ray diffraction study Hit paper breakdown → | 1988 | 305 |
| 2 | 1981 | 120 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 110 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 86 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 76 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 67 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 64 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 49 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 35 | |
| 10 | 1980 | 34 | |
| 11 | 1979 | 32 | |
| 12 | 1977 | 30 | |
| 13 | 1971 | 22 | |
| 14 | 1975 | 10 |
About G. King
G. King is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (9 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (3 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (2 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (2 papers), Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling (2 papers) and ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (302 citations), Dermatology (133 citations), Molecular Biology (748 citations), Organic Chemistry (232 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (131 citations). G. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen H. White, Dorla Mirejovsky, C.R. Worthington, Russell E. Jacobs, Michael C. Wiener, Thomas J. McIntosh, B. P. Schoenborn, A.E. Blaurock, Henry L. Crespi and Walther Stoeckenius. Their work appears in journals such as Biophysical Journal, Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biochemistry and Physics Letters A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.