G. Bosch

108 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

G. Bosch
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Insect Science 1.1k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 557
  • Small Animals 324
  • Social Psychology 729
  • Cell Biology 506
Replace Pietro Lombardi with:
Pietro Lombardi Italy
W.H. Hendriks Netherlands
W.J.J. Gerrits Netherlands
Silvia Martínez-Miró Spain
Antonella Dalle Zotte Italy
Jérôme Bindelle Belgium
Larry W. Douglass United States
M.J.W. Heetkamp Netherlands
A.F.B. van der Poel Netherlands
P.C.H. Morel New Zealand
G. Bosch relative to Pietro Lombardi Italy Pietro Lombardi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Pietro Lombardi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Bosch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Bosch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Bosch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Bosch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Bosch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Bosch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Bosch. The network helps show where G. Bosch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Bosch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Bosch Line = papers co-authored together G. Bosch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004393
2 2013279
3 2014238
4 2015210
5 2019174
6 2017125
7 2015122
8 2011121
9 200898
10 201997
11 201473
12 201673
13 201871
14 200969
15
Insects as a sustainable feed ingredient in pig and poultry diets : a feasibility study = Insecten als duurzame diervoedergrondstof in varkens- en pluimveevoeders : een haalbaarheidsstudie
201269
16 201262
17 199262
18 201462
19 201261
20 200861

About G. Bosch

G. Bosch is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Food Science, having authored 113 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Utilization and Effects (19 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (17 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (13 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (12 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (12 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (10 papers), Gut microbiota and health (10 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Resistance (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.1k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (557 citations), Small Animals (324 citations), Social Psychology (729 citations) and Cell Biology (506 citations). G. Bosch has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include W.H. Hendriks, D.G.A.B. Oonincx, W.G. Flier, T. Veldkamp, Freek T. Bakker, Laurens P. N. M. Kroon, P.J.M. Bonants, H.J. van der Fels‐Klerx, Sheng Zhang and A.F.B. van der Poel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, Animal Feed Science and Technology, British Journal Of Nutrition and Journal of Nutritional Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact