G. Bosch

108 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

G. Bosch
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Insect Science 1.2k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 580
  • Small Animals 338
  • Social Psychology 774
  • Cell Biology 520
Replace W.H. Hendriks with:
W.H. Hendriks Netherlands
Pietro Lombardi Italy
W.J.J. Gerrits Netherlands
Silvia Martínez-Miró Spain
Antonella Dalle Zotte Italy
Larry W. Douglass United States
Jérôme Bindelle Belgium
A.F.B. van der Poel Netherlands
M.J.W. Heetkamp Netherlands
Metha Wanapat Thailand
G. Bosch relative to W.H. Hendriks Netherlands W.H. Hendriks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
W.H. Hendriks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Bosch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Bosch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Bosch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Bosch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Bosch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Bosch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Bosch. The network helps show where G. Bosch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Bosch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Bosch Line = papers co-authored together G. Bosch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004405
2 2013293
3 2014244
4 2015227
5 2019179
6 2017133
7 2011127
8 2015124
9 2008107
10 201999
11
Insects as a sustainable feed ingredient in pig and poultry diets : a feasibility study = Insecten als duurzame diervoedergrondstof in varkens- en pluimveevoeders : een haalbaarheidsstudie
201278
12 201675
13 201474
14 200974
15 201872
16 201869
17 199268
18 201467
19 201264
20 201264

About G. Bosch

G. Bosch is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Food Science, having authored 113 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Utilization and Effects (19 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (17 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (13 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (12 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (12 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (10 papers), Gut microbiota and health (10 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Resistance (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.2k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (580 citations), Small Animals (338 citations), Social Psychology (774 citations) and Cell Biology (520 citations). G. Bosch has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include W.H. Hendriks, D.G.A.B. Oonincx, T. Veldkamp, W.G. Flier, Laurens P. N. M. Kroon, P.J.M. Bonants, Freek T. Bakker, H.J. van der Fels‐Klerx, A.F.B. van der Poel and Sheng Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, Animal Feed Science and Technology, Journal of Nutritional Science and British Journal Of Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact