G. Amer

489 citations
8 papers · 271 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Neurology top 10%
    • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
    • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
    • Neurological diseases and metabolism
  • Toxicology top 10%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Papers in

G. Amer

8 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

G. Amer
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Neurology 139
  • Neurology 67
  • Toxicology 20
  • Physiology 125
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 68
Replace Janet Sangare with:
Janet Sangare United States
Alexandrine Corriger France
Nathan C. Stam Australia
Luisa Mari Italy
Tobias Langheinrich United Kingdom
Wang Zheng Chiu Netherlands
Brian T. Terpstra United States
S Odell United States
Verónica Paz Spain
Barbara Vogt Germany
G. Amer relative to Janet Sangare United States Janet Sangare's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Janet Sangare · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Amer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Amer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Amer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Amer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Amer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Amer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Amer. The network helps show where G. Amer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Amer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Amer Line = papers co-authored together G. Amer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2001112
2 201359
3 201055
4
Undetected neuropsychophysiological sequelae of khat chewing in standard aviation medical examination.
199524
5 20198
6 20186
7 20174
8
[Observational study on safety, tolerability and effectiveness of galantamine in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease].
20063

About G. Amer

G. Amer is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Molecular Biology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (1 paper), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (139 citations), Neurology (67 citations), Toxicology (20 citations), Physiology (125 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (68 citations). G. Amer has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Netherlands and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Rafael Oliva, Cristóbal Carnero Pardo, Pau Pástor, E. Tolosa, Judith Allardyce, Claudia J.P. Simons, Miguel Ángel González Torres, Marta Galdós, Aranzazu Fernández‐Rivas and Inez Myin‐Germeys. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Geriatrics, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Annals of Neurology, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact