Fu‐Chuan Wei

12 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

Fu‐Chuan Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 184
  • Biological Psychiatry 28
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 113
  • Pharmacology 42
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 37
Replace Cho‐Boon Sim with:
Cho‐Boon Sim Taiwan
Gus Alva United States
A. A. Bolonna United Kingdom
Joachim Scharfetter Austria
D. Carreon United States
Darcie L. Kurtz United States
Yoshihiro Tadori Japan
Ryosuke Miyatake Japan
Peter Turrone Canada
Marcella Rietschel Germany
Fu‐Chuan Wei relative to Cho‐Boon Sim Taiwan Cho‐Boon Sim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Cho‐Boon Sim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fu‐Chuan Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fu‐Chuan Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fu‐Chuan Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fu‐Chuan Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fu‐Chuan Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fu‐Chuan Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fu‐Chuan Wei. The network helps show where Fu‐Chuan Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Fu‐Chuan Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fu‐Chuan Wei Line = papers co-authored together Fu‐Chuan Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 199780
2 199875
3 199650
4 199938
5 199732
6 199728
7 199718
8
A practical loading dose method for converting schizophrenic patients from oral to depot haloperidol therapy.
199617
9 200111
10 19969
11 19964
12 19961

About Fu‐Chuan Wei

Fu‐Chuan Wei is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Biological Psychiatry, Physiology and Genetics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (184 citations), Biological Psychiatry (28 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (113 citations), Pharmacology (42 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (37 citations). Fu‐Chuan Wei has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Kwang‐Jen Hsiao, Michael W. Jann, Shih‐Ku Lin, Wen‐Ho Chang, Hsien‐Yuan Lane, Hai‐Gwo Hwu, Wei-Herng Hu, Yu-Ru Lee, Chia‐Hsiang Chen and Mei‐Ying Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, American Journal of Psychiatry, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental and Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact