Frieda Matthys

1.2k citations
46 papers · 677 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Frieda Matthys

43 papers receiving 664 citations

Peers

Frieda Matthys
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Clinical Psychology 294
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 176
  • Applied Psychology 46
  • Neurology 59
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 114
Replace Massimiliano Aragona with:
Massimiliano Aragona Italy
Graham M.L. Eglit United States
Antoine Yrondi France
Thiago Marques Fidalgo Brazil
Dieter Zeeuws Belgium
Stephen E. Hall United States
Nathalie Vanderbruggen Belgium
Jason P. Caplan United States
Naresh Nebhinani India
Bernardo dos Santos Brazil
Frieda Matthys relative to Massimiliano Aragona Italy Massimiliano Aragona's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Massimiliano Aragona · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frieda Matthys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frieda Matthys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frieda Matthys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frieda Matthys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frieda Matthys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frieda Matthys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frieda Matthys. The network helps show where Frieda Matthys may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frieda Matthys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frieda Matthys Line = papers co-authored together Frieda Matthys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020292
2 2018102
3 201553
4 201333
5 201631
6 202318
7 201914
8 201613
9 197211
10 201510
11 20159
12 20199
13 20149
14 20167
15 20147
16 20225
17
[ADHD and addiction: a complicated liaison].
20125
18 20024
19 20214
20 20223

About Frieda Matthys

Frieda Matthys is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Epidemiology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (14 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers) and Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (294 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (176 citations), Applied Psychology (46 citations), Neurology (59 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (114 citations). Frieda Matthys has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cleo L. Crunelle, Dieter Zeeuws, Nathalie Vanderbruggen, Seline van den Ameele, Sven Van Laere, Liesbeth Santermans, Wim van den Brink, Rudi De Raedt, Peter Van Schuerbeek and Johan De Mey. Their work appears in journals such as European Addiction Research, Alcohol and Alcoholism, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact