Geert Dom

144 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Geert Dom
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • General Decision Sciences 117
  • Applied Psychology 226
  • Toxicology 152
  • Clinical Psychology 743
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 498
Replace Joy M. Schmitz with:
Joy M. Schmitz United States
Kenneth Silverman United States
Jennifer Mitchell United States
Susumu Higuchi Japan
Justin C. Strickland United States
Marc I. Rosen United States
Arpana Agrawal United States
Colin Drummond United Kingdom
Arnt Schellekens Netherlands
Jeesun Jung United States
Geert Dom relative to Joy M. Schmitz United States Joy M. Schmitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joy M. Schmitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geert Dom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geert Dom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geert Dom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geert Dom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geert Dom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geert Dom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geert Dom. The network helps show where Geert Dom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Geert Dom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Geert Dom Line = papers co-authored together Geert Dom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 151 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014241
2 2005181
3 2005175
4 2011134
5 2005121
6 2012111
7 2012107
8 2019106
9 2003105
10 2013103
11 2011101
12 201694
13 200688
14 201685
15 202078
16 201677
17 202168
18 200665
19 201865
20 200665

About Geert Dom

Geert Dom is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Social Psychology, having authored 151 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (17 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (13 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (12 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (11 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (10 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (117 citations), Applied Psychology (226 citations), Toxicology (152 citations), Clinical Psychology (743 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (498 citations). Geert Dom has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Wouter Hulstijn, Bernard Sabbe, Wim van den Brink, Antonio Verdejo‐García, Anna E. Goudriaan, B. Sabbe, Bieke De Wilde, Wouter Vanderplasschen, Laura J. Stevens and Herbert Roeyers. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, European Addiction Research, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Alcohol and Alcoholism and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact