Freya Mathews
Impact in
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions
-
- Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Papers in
-
- Religion, Ecology, and Ethics 14
- Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems 3
-
- Environmental Philosophy and Ethics 17
- Co-authors
- Christopher Johnson (1 shared paper)Helle Tegnér Anker (1 shared paper)Wolfgang Köck (1 shared paper)Jana Bovet (1 shared paper)Sanne Akerboom (1 shared paper)An Cliquet (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Environmental Values (3 papers)Worldviews Global Religions Culture and Ecology (3 papers)Biological Conservation (2 papers)Environmental Politics (2 papers)Environmental Ethics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaBangladesh
In The Last Decade
Freya Mathews
44 papers receiving 422 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Geography, Planning and Development 86
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 144
- Philosophy 54
- Human-Computer Interaction 25
- Architecture 6
Countries citing papers authored by Freya Mathews
This map shows the geographic impact of Freya Mathews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Freya Mathews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Freya Mathews more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Freya Mathews
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Freya Mathews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Freya Mathews. The network helps show where Freya Mathews may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Freya Mathews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 88 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 65 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 18 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 6 |
About Freya Mathews
Freya Mathews is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Geography, Planning and Development, Ecology and Social Psychology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (17 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (14 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (7 papers), Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems (3 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (2 papers), Environmental law and policy (2 papers), Design Education and Practice (2 papers) and Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (86 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (144 citations), Philosophy (54 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (25 citations) and Architecture (6 citations). Freya Mathews has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Johnson, Helle Tegnér Anker, Wolfgang Köck, Jana Bovet, Sanne Akerboom and An Cliquet. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Values, Worldviews Global Religions Culture and Ecology, Biological Conservation, Environmental Politics and Environmental Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.