Peder Anker

851 citations
45 papers · 459 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Peder Anker

32 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers

Peder Anker
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Geography, Planning and Development 68
  • History and Philosophy of Science 46
  • Architecture 9
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 53
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 43
Replace Freya Mathews with:
Freya Mathews Australia
John Dixon Hunt United States
Neil Evernden
Warwick Fox United Kingdom
Douglas M. Peers Canada
Peter Coates United Kingdom
Emily O’Gorman Australia
Catherine Larrère France
Augustin Berque France
Patrick Curry United Kingdom
Peder Anker relative to Freya Mathews Australia Freya Mathews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Freya Mathews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peder Anker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peder Anker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peder Anker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peder Anker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peder Anker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peder Anker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peder Anker. The network helps show where Peder Anker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Peder Anker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peder Anker Line = papers co-authored together Peder Anker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200186
2 200352
3 200537
4 201633
5
From Bauhaus to Ecohouse: A History of Ecological Design
201032
6 200528
7 200520
8 200218
9 200717
10
202215
11 200415
12 200713
13 199812
14 20218
15 20097
16 20037
17 20067
18
Deep Ecology in Bucharest
20086
19 20046
20 20136

About Peder Anker

Peder Anker is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 45 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (8 papers), History of Science and Natural History (8 papers), History of Science and Medicine (7 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (5 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (5 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (5 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (4 papers) and Australian Indigenous Culture and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (68 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (46 citations), Architecture (9 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (53 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (43 citations). Peder Anker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Nina Witoszek, O. P. F. Clausen, Staffan Müller‐Wille, Nick Hopwood, Guido Giglioni, Lynn K. Nyhart, Mathias Grote, Warwick Anderson, Hans‐Jörg Rheinberger and Erik Thorud. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental History, Isis, Metascience, Archives of Natural History and Journal of the History of Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact