Peder Anker

842 citations
41 papers · 362 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Peder Anker

30 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Peder Anker
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Geography, Planning and Development 60
  • History and Philosophy of Science 42
  • Architecture 9
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 37
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 37
Replace Freya Mathews with:
Freya Mathews Australia
John Dixon Hunt United States
Peter Coates United Kingdom
Douglas M. Peers Canada
Emily O’Gorman Australia
Douglas R. Weiner United States
Catherine Larrère France
Deborah R. Coen United States
Augustin Berque France
Joachim Radkau Germany
Peder Anker relative to Freya Mathews Australia Freya Mathews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Freya Mathews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peder Anker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peder Anker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peder Anker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peder Anker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peder Anker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peder Anker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peder Anker. The network helps show where Peder Anker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Peder Anker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peder Anker Line = papers co-authored together Peder Anker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200171
2 200341
3 200533
4
From Bauhaus to Ecohouse: A History of Ecological Design
201029
5 201627
6 200518
7 200715
8 200213
9
202212
10 200512
11 200711
12 19989
13 20049
14 20218
15 20097
16 20037
17 20046
18 20146
19 20065
20 20044

About Peder Anker

Peder Anker is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Anthropology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 41 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Natural History (8 papers), History of Science and Medicine (7 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (5 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (5 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (5 papers), Australian Indigenous Culture and History (3 papers) and Art, Technology, and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (60 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (42 citations), Architecture (9 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (37 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (37 citations). Peder Anker has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Nina Witoszek, Mathias Grote, Warwick Anderson, Rolf Bjerknes, Guido Giglioni, Erik Thorud, Shigehisa Kuriyama, Janet Browne, Staffan Müller‐Wille and Lynn K. Nyhart. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental History, Isis, Metascience, Journal of the History of Biology and Archives of Natural History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact