Emme Chacko

15 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Emme Chacko
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 11
  • Biological Psychiatry 20
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 171
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 21
  • Epidemiology 129
Replace Jan H. Vercoulen with:
Jan H. Vercoulen Netherlands
Jiaxi Yu China
Larissa Bertacchini de Oliveira Brazil
Inés Cruz Spain
Eun Ju Lim South Korea
Shahieda Adams South Africa
Åsa Lindh Sweden
Jenny M. Gormley United States
Michelle Bramley Australia
Heather Sharpe Canada
Emme Chacko relative to Jan H. Vercoulen Netherlands Jan H. Vercoulen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Jan H. Vercoulen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emme Chacko

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emme Chacko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emme Chacko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emme Chacko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emme Chacko

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emme Chacko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emme Chacko. The network helps show where Emme Chacko may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Emme Chacko, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emme Chacko Line = papers co-authored together Emme Chacko links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2006260
2 202147
3 200044
4 201921
5 201518
6 202218
7
Replacing sugar-based soft drinks with sugar-free alternatives could slow the progress of the obesity epidemic: have your Coke and drink it too.
20038
8 20138
9 20187
10 20196
11 20185
12 20164
13 20232
14 20222
15 20191

About Emme Chacko

Emme Chacko is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Older Adults Driving Studies (3 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (1 paper) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (11 citations), Biological Psychiatry (20 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (171 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (21 citations) and Epidemiology (129 citations). Emme Chacko has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J Cates, Phillippa Poole, Richard Wood‐Baker, Gary Cheung, Yoram Barak, Frederick Sundram, Valerie Wright‐St Clair, Carole Adamson, Meg J. Spriggs and Rod Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, International Psychogeriatrics, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Mindfulness and Journal of Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact