David Fuller
Impact in
-
- Foot and Ankle Surgery
- Sports injuries and prevention
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Papers in
- Surgery 32
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 14
- Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 6
-
- Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment 9
- Co-authors
- Sanford E. Emery (3 shared papers)Mary Ann Keenan (6 shared papers)R. Geoffrey Wilber (1 shared paper)Dwight T. Davy (1 shared paper)John S. Kirkpatrick (1 shared paper)Luis A. Guerrero (11 shared papers)Sharon Stevenson (2 shared papers)José A. Pino (10 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (5 papers)Orthopedics (4 papers)Notes (4 papers)Early Music (3 papers)Spine (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
David Fuller
84 papers receiving 804 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 137
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 209
- Rehabilitation 68
- Surgery 419
- Human-Computer Interaction 50
Countries citing papers authored by David Fuller
This map shows the geographic impact of David Fuller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Fuller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Fuller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Fuller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Fuller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Fuller. The network helps show where David Fuller may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Fuller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 153 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 109 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 56 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 28 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 26 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 12 |
About David Fuller
David Fuller is a scholar working on Surgery, Rehabilitation, Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems and Epidemiology, having authored 109 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (10 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (9 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (7 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (6 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (137 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (209 citations), Rehabilitation (68 citations), Surgery (419 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (50 citations). David Fuller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sanford E. Emery, Mary Ann Keenan, R. Geoffrey Wilber, Dwight T. Davy, John S. Kirkpatrick, Luis A. Guerrero, Sharon Stevenson, José A. Pino, Jeffrey L. Tanji and James Barrett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Orthopedics, Notes, Early Music and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.