Frederick L. Bates

1.3k citations
54 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick L. Bates

49 papers receiving 807 citations

Peers

Frederick L. Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Emergency Medical Services 79
  • Sociology and Political Science 595
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 106
  • Gender Studies 53
  • Strategy and Management 85
Replace Max Stephenson with:
Max Stephenson United States
Christopher P. Cooper United States
Emily Chamlee‐Wright United States
Robert A. Stallings United States
R. Anthony Turner Canada
Richard C. Rich United States
Peter Kellett Canada
Jon Goss United States
Scott E. Robinson United States
Matthew A. Koschmann United States
Frederick L. Bates relative to Max Stephenson United States Max Stephenson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Max Stephenson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick L. Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick L. Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick L. Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick L. Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick L. Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick L. Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick L. Bates. The network helps show where Frederick L. Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Frederick L. Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick L. Bates Line = papers co-authored together Frederick L. Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195792
2 197685
3 197773
4 196466
5 196363
6 195657
7 198753
8 198950
9 197350
10 198345
11 199437
12 198928
13 197225
14 198925
15 199224
16 198019
17 197218
18 196118
19
Disaster and Social Change
198717
20 196611

About Frederick L. Bates

Frederick L. Bates is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Soil Science and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disaster Management and Resilience (6 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (3 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (2 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (1 paper), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (1 paper), Academic Freedom and Politics (1 paper) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (79 citations), Sociology and Political Science (595 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (106 citations), Gender Studies (53 citations) and Strategy and Management (85 citations). Frederick L. Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Walter Gillis Peacock, James D. Thompson, Frank J. Landy, V. J. Parenton, Richard A. Peterson, C D Killian, C. W. Fogleman, James W. Balkwell, Gary A. Kreps and Lee Freese. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, Disasters, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal of Applied Psychology and American Sociological Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact