Frederick E. Evans

1.5k citations
32 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick E. Evans

32 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Frederick E. Evans
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Pollution 423
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 317
  • Cancer Research 294
  • Pharmacology 121
  • Pharmaceutical Science 74
Replace A. M. Jeffrey with:
A. M. Jeffrey United States
J.L. Epler United States
Vernon J. Feil United States
Michael D. Corbett United States
Alan M. Jeffrey United States
Linda S. Von Tungeln United States
Giorgio L. Bronzetti Italy
Philip G. Watanabe United States
Leo P.A. De Jong Netherlands
Kun Chae United States
Frederick E. Evans relative to A. M. Jeffrey United States A. M. Jeffrey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
A. M. Jeffrey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick E. Evans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick E. Evans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick E. Evans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick E. Evans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick E. Evans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick E. Evans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick E. Evans. The network helps show where Frederick E. Evans may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick E. Evans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick E. Evans Line = papers co-authored together Frederick E. Evans links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991143
2 1989142
3 1993125
4 198078
5 198274
6 198066
7 198465
8 198964
9 198361
10 198252
11 199049
12 199547
13 197646
14 197540
15 199437
16 199237
17 199334
18 198231
19 199627
20 199721

About Frederick E. Evans

Frederick E. Evans is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Spectroscopy, Pollution, Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (7 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (7 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (5 papers), Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (3 papers), Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants (3 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (3 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pollution (423 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (317 citations), Cancer Research (294 citations), Pharmacology (121 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (74 citations). Frederick E. Evans has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include James P. Freeman, Carl E. Cerniglia, Fred F. Kadlubar, J V Pothuluri, Bongsup Cho, Sandra J. Culp, Frederick A. Beland, Leonard E. Unruh, Peter P. Fu and John B. Sutherland. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Chemico-Biological Interactions, Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Carcinogenesis and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact