Constance C. Weis

1.7k citations
34 papers · 1.5k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Constance C. Weis

34 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Constance C. Weis
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Cancer Research 406
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 349
  • Pharmacology 164
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 263
  • Biochemistry 76
Replace J.C. Topham with:
J.C. Topham United Kingdom
T.J. Slaga United States
Tomoya Yamada Japan
Robert W. Chadwick United States
Alain Barbin France
Carlos E. Vaca Sweden
R W Pero Sweden
G. Jean Horbach Netherlands
D.S.R. Sarma Canada
James S. Felton United States
Constance C. Weis relative to J.C. Topham United Kingdom J.C. Topham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
J.C. Topham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance C. Weis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance C. Weis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance C. Weis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance C. Weis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance C. Weis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance C. Weis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance C. Weis. The network helps show where Constance C. Weis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constance C. Weis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance C. Weis Line = papers co-authored together Constance C. Weis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980284
2 2001182
3
Metabolic oxidation of carcinogenic arylamines by rat, dog, and human hepatic microsomes and by purified flavin-containing and cytochrome P-450 monooxygenases.
1985132
4 198270
5 200866
6 200265
7 200965
8 198360
9 198559
10 200259
11 198455
12 200245
13 198535
14 198332
15 200128
16 200427
17 200426
18 198525
19 198223
20 200223

About Constance C. Weis

Constance C. Weis is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cancer Research, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (12 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (9 papers), Phytoestrogen effects and research (8 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (7 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (5 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (3 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (406 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (349 citations), Pharmacology (164 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (263 citations) and Biochemistry (76 citations). Constance C. Weis has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include David T. Beranek, David H. Swenson, K. Barry Delclos, Fred F. Kadlubar, Retha R. Newbold, John R. Latendresse, Frederick A. Beland, Thomas J. Bucci, Alan Warbritton and F. Peter Guengerich. Their work appears in journals such as Carcinogenesis, Reproductive Toxicology, Chemico-Biological Interactions, Toxicology and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact