Frédéric Lavainne

9 papers receiving 195 citations

Peers

Frédéric Lavainne
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Biological Psychiatry 64
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
  • Nephrology 37
  • Immunology 61
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 9
Replace Viktoriya Kuntsevich with:
Viktoriya Kuntsevich United States
Tzu‐Rong Peng Taiwan
Ewelina Łukaszyk Poland
Jan Długosz Poland
Karl‐Peter Schlingmann Germany
Alyson Kelley-Hedgepeth United States
Sara Pinto France
Yaohan Zhou China
Annenienke C. van de Ven Netherlands
Sara Denicolò Austria
Frédéric Lavainne relative to Viktoriya Kuntsevich United States Viktoriya Kuntsevich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
Viktoriya Kuntsevich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Lavainne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Lavainne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Lavainne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Lavainne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Lavainne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Lavainne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Lavainne. The network helps show where Frédéric Lavainne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Lavainne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Lavainne Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Lavainne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2007123
2 202223
3 202115
4 201414
5 201711
6 20197
7 20221
8 20221
9 20211
10 20110
11 20180

About Frédéric Lavainne

Frédéric Lavainne is a scholar working on Nephrology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Surgery, having authored 11 papers that have together received 196 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (5 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers), Neurological Complications and Syndromes (2 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (1 paper), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (1 paper), Vasculitis and related conditions (1 paper), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Healthcare Systems and Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (64 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations), Nephrology (37 citations), Immunology (61 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (9 citations). Frédéric Lavainne has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Régis Josien, Christine Chauveau, Marie Rimbert, Laurent Tesson, Séverine Tanguy‐Royer, Séverine Remy, Marcelo Hill, Pierre‐Joseph Royer, François‐Xavier Hubert and Michèle Heslan. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Immunology, Blood Purification, Kidney International Reports, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology and Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact